The
Skeleton Remains
“The
book was so much better than the movie” is a quote as old as cinema, however
when a movie, as well as the book gives you a brilliant lesson and those two
lessons complete one another it is a new situation entirely. Now, to compare
two separate views of the exact same material is a task indeed; however in this
particular instance one has a brilliant focus tying the two together. Both
stories follow the plot of Franz Kafka’s “The Metamorphosis” novella. However
there is one point where they differ dramatically. In Kafka’s original work,
Gregor wakes up fully transformed into an insect, whereas in Carlos Atanes’
cinematic remake Gregor suffers only a partial transformation. What does it
mean for Gregor to remain half human? Well it means Carlos was trying to bring
attention to a new point and in a way, leave his mark on the world of
literature. By drastically changing the imagery Carlos modified the entirety of
Kafka’s well-disguised connotation.
Though this is the same story, research uncovers two different lenses
through which to view this work. The writer as well as the author hides their
own moral deep within the work, waiting patiently for a diligent reader to
uncover it.
As
a writer Kafka’s outlook on life was severely dark and twisted. He saw the
world as an endless cycle of life and death in which everyone involved efforts
to be remembered were futile and lacked meaning. When one dies, his family may
mourn for a time, but that period of depression will be short lived and the
role that said deceased individual left vacant will be filled by another until
they inevitably vacate it as well. A dark outlook? Yes, a twisted and morbidly
disturbing view of life? Most definitely, but this was Franz Kafka and this was
the underlying theme of his metamorphosis. Gregor fully transforms and falls
from grace, lives out the remainder of his days in a useless manner, and
finally vacates his slot in life. The role is immediately filled by his sister
and life goes on at its unstoppable yet glacial pace. .
Thank you Mr. Kafka for your sunny disposition.
From
Antanes’ remix of Kafka’s novella the story begins the night prior to the
change as opposed to the morning of. Instead of being locked in his bedroom,
Gregor is confined to the library. Rather than be a fully transformed pest,
Gregor is a half-humanoid, half-insect atrocity. All these changes, some minor
as they may be, have modified the entire theme of the work.
By
starting the day preceding our author’s opening day, our director gives a more
intimate look into the human Gregor. We
see him as a loving caring person who clearly loves his sister above all
others. He then retires to the library where while reading passes out only to
wake up a humanoid monster. However, one can still see the human half of
Gregor. This depicts a man who is fighting
to remain himself. This is a portrayal
of a man who is on hard times and is struggling merely to survive. By keeping the original translation of what
the transformation symbolized, which was a fall from grace; one can conclude
that Gregor has only partially descended.
The
theme changes in cinematic from roles and endless cycles, to strength in one’s
family. What Gregor needs to survive, to
save him from his downward spiral to an inexorable and gruesome conclusion to
his life, is his family’s support. Should his family step in and lend him their
aid, he could survive. However, he is
shunned by his family and confined to the library, blamed for the negative
occurrences that fall upon the household, and is forcefully beaten should he
venture out of his cell. This is not how family should treat one another! No
one could ever hope to strive in these conditions. Our director begins the
movie showing the viewer how much love exists between the brother and the
sister. Later he blatantly focuses on a single line uttered by the sister. All
camera’s focus on Gregor’s sister as she proclaims “Can you not see! This is
not my brother!” (Atanes) A devastating blow indeed to the main character of
this tragedy. Following this, he returns to the library and finally surrenders
to the cold darkness.
A
slight tweak here, a turn of phrase there, and what was our original novella is
turned to an entirely new work. With the theme changed the cinematic was a mere
skeleton of the original work. So in truth, what started as a meshing of two
views of the same story was a comparison of the same work no longer. It became a contrast of two spectacular works
tied together only by their both sharing the same plot. Applause to our
director as well as our writer, Kafka gave us a look at the inescapable reality
of a futile life cycle. Antanes gave us a lesson on family reliance and when
the two works come together one finds themselves truly enlightened.
Works Cited
Carlos
Antanes
"THE
METAMORPHOSIS OF FRANZ KAFKA: FILM ON-LINE." THE METAMORPHOSIS OF FRANZ
KAFKA. Web. 31 May 2012. <http://www.carlosatanes.com/metamorphosis_franz_kafka_online.html>.
Kafka-Online
Gregor.
"Franz Kafka." Online. Gregor, 2007. Web. 25 May 2012.
<http://www.kafka-online.info/>.
KafkaFranz
"Franz
Kafka Writing." Franz Kafka Writing. Web. 25 May 2012. <http://kafka-franz.com/franz-kafka-writing.htm>.
Your comparative analysis is very interesting. I like the way you compared the two stories using the item by item style. The movie was really good, and one could really see the difference between the story as well as the similarities. But the differences between the two versions were greater than the similarities. However, the movies really helped me to understand the text better, especially the poor relationship that Gregor had with his family. Indeed, it was really sorrowful, I felt pity for Gregor. Your essay really flowed with the way you compared the two versions, you did a good job.
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading your analysis it was very organized. I didn't think of how symbolic his transformation as half human and half insect in the movie was towards the his body as a whole insect in the text. You had great details to show the different meanings. That indeed made me feel even more pain for Gregor because all he wanted was his family. Great paper
ReplyDeletethanks you both for your comments. =)
ReplyDeleteThis is much better then your original draft. You really did a good job at turning this into more of an essay and less like a movie review. Also good job on turning around those questions and making them more formal. You also added quotes in to help strengthen your analysis. I hope my tips when revising your original draft helped you out and you didn’t think I was just being mean. But I think you did a good job at coming a long way from your original draft.
ReplyDelete